“Ang Lee’s ‘Life of Pi’ is the best-looking film I’ve seen this year, and possibly so far this century,” says Lou Lumenick in the New York Post. “It’s so hypnotically beautiful that people will be using it to calibrate their new TV monitors.”
For a CGI-incorporated movie, Ang Lee’s vision of a story that tells the tale of a boy that survives a shipwreck and winds up drifting in the Pacific Ocean on a lifeboat with a Bengal tiger. Yes, the tiger is indeed a CGI, but is a real digital rendering of four real-life tigers that were on set, main star Suraj Sharma told HuffPost Entertainment.
The CGI is indeed one of the eye-catcher in the movie. Robert Ebert’s official website tells:
“What astonishes me is how much I love the use of 3-D in ‘Life of Pi. I’ve never seen the medium better employed, not even in ‘Avatar,’ and although I continue to have doubts about it in general, Lee never uses it for surprises or sensations, but only to deepen the film’s sense of places and events.”
If there are a lot of positive reviews on the movie, it does not imply it’s always pure white for this one. As always, there is a flip side to the coin and others are merely not as enthusiastic as others have been.
The movie invites you to believe in all kinds of marvelous things, but it also may cause you to doubt what you see with your own eyes — or even to wonder if, in the end, you have seen anything at all,” warned A.O. Scott in The New York Times.
That says it, there are many whites than blacks onetheless. So if you want to head over for more Life of Pi reviews, check out Rotten Tomatoes.
No comments:
Post a Comment